One popular idea is that slaves have no choices once they are owned. Others do not agree with this concept. Is this an accurate statement for you?

In my experience, slaves always have a choice. Whether to stay with their Master or to leave. This can mean a variety of things.

I do recognize slaves as still being human beings and because they are still human they will always have choices. They can choose to either follow their Master's orders or to do as they please knowing the consequences. They can choose to communicate when they have an issue with something or they can ignore any problems they have within the relationship and hope for the best. There are always choices in relationships. Sometimes the things that submissives and slave types perceive as bad (such as communication and expressing their own views when they don't match up with their Dominant types) really are not bad because refusing to do them will eventually crumble away at the relationship. There is always a choice, even for the Masters/Dominants.

So how is it that a slave has no choice? Well, a slave always has a choice, which they can also choose to have included in their relationship or it can be something agreed upon that it's not a choice they have, but in that instance they are willingly giving up that right. (I don't agree with it, but they still made a choice to not have the right to leave.)

There will always be a choice. And, honestly, in my experience, many of those relationships where the choice to leave is taken from the slave, the relationship still ends and the slave does leave (usually through being released). Yet, in their opinion and their view, they didn't have the right. I feel it's rather unfair to put all the weight of ending the relationship on one party in any relationship. That's one big reason why I don't believe in that. A slave always has the right to leave, whether s/he acts on it or not.